The Covenant of Circumcision (Gen 17)

Genesis 17 is a pretty significant chapter.  We could summarize the story of the entire Bible by starting here.  A general survey of Christianity could start here.  God gives Abram the covenant of circumcision, and then foretells the birth of Issac.  Let’s deal with circumcision in this setting.

In the ancient world names meant something.  I’ve looked up Clark in the books, and my name means either scholar or clergy.  I like my name.  Well, I like my first name.  My last name, Bunch, means person with a humpback.  You can’t win ’em all.  At any rate, Abram literally means father.  Abram has already believed God’s promise that he will father an entire nation, or in fact many nations.  Abram’s name gets changed by God to Abraham, which is father of many.  His name, which already meant something, now means something even greater.

Then God explains the rite of circumcision, and that it will be an outward sign of the people of faith.  Two things to remember here; one is that a lot of Judaism had to do with being different from the rest of the world.  This included outwardly in appearance and behavior, in addition to their faith and belief system.  Circumcision was a sign.  It made them physically different, like the beards and not cutting the hair of the temples.  The statement is mentioned here and many other times (like when the 10 commandments are being given) that Abraham’s family will be God’s people and he will be their God.  Circumcision is an outward sign of the covenant relationship.

The other thing to remember is that the Old Testament makes a lot more sense after reading the New.  The Passover story, the whole sacrificial system, those are just scary stories until we read the Gospels.  Then we go “Oh, I get it now.”  After reading the history of the Jews and learning over and over about a vengeful and jealous God, being offered mercy and grace really means something.  When a person gets saved, is that saved from sin, saved from hell, saved from death?  No, salvation is about being saved from God’s wrath.  God’s wrath was poured out on Jesus as he hung on the cross, so that we never have to receive it.  The Old Testament helps us appreciate the Gospel for what it’s worth.  Under the New Covenant, baptism is the outward expression of our faith.  Baptism is to the New Testament church what circumcision was to the Hebrews; the outward expression of faith.  They were the children of Abraham, we are spiritually the children of Abraham.  We are a holy nation, a royal priesthood, but not made up of any one political nation.  The descendants of Abraham made up the nation of Israel, the people of the New Testament church are the Kingdom of God not made with hands.  They were God’s people, we are God’s people.

I can’t discuss or teach the Old Testament in a vacuum; the New Testament is like the magic decoder ring that makes the symbols and images make sense.  Just like Passover became the Lord’s supper, circumcision in the equivalent of baptism.  Hopefully this answers some questions.  If not, go ahead and ask them.  I’m game.

Advertisements

4 Responses to The Covenant of Circumcision (Gen 17)

  1. MenAfterGod.com says:

    Clark what’s your take on circumcision today? Why circumcise? Medically there is not proven health benefit. Sexually it can cause problems. Why are Christians still drawn to this barbaric act? It’s dangerous. And more and more reports show it can psychologically damaged some persons.

    Glen
    “Lov’n the Lord & Liv’n the Life…”

    • Clark Bunch says:

      You lost me Glen. The vast marjoity of American men are circumcised. There is a medical benefit; it’s a lot easier to keep clean, and the chance of infection, rash, etc. is virtually eliminated. Now I’m talking about circumcision performed by a doctor shortly after birth, not some religious ritual that may be going around among adults. I’m not aware of such a thing, but perhaps that’s what you are referring to. I would hardly call it barbaric; most guys are circumcised, Christian or otherwise, in our society.

  2. Glen says:

    Quoteend quote.http://www.cirp.org/library/general/wallerstein/
    No health benefits have ever been proven. If circusion was the only way and the best way why has the rest of the world not responded?

    It’s all about the money!

  3. ………… There is a movement of Jews who are questioning circumcision, and working to end this abuse of children. The movement ranges from the Orthodox to the secular, and includes mothers, fathers, scholars, historians, medical professionals, activists, and intellectuals.

    Jewish Groups for Genital Integrity

    * Brit Shalom Celebrants by Mark D. Reiss, M.D. http://www.circumstitions.com/Jewish-shalom.html

    * Questioning Circumcision: A Jewish Perspective by Ron Goldman, Ph.D. http://www.jewishcircumcision.org

    * The Current Judaic Movement to End Circumcision: Part 1
    http://intactnews.org/node/105/1311886372/jewish-voices-current-judaic-movement-end-circumcision-part-1

    Circumcision: A Jewish Feminist Perspective by Miriam Pollack
    http://www.noharmm.org/pollack.htm

    Jewish Intactivist Miriam Pollack has some great commentary on Foreskin Man in this recent interview.
    http://www.beyondthebris.com/2011/07/defying-convention-interview-with_27.html

    Jews Speak Out in Favor of Banning Circumcision on Minors
    http://intactnews.org/node/103/1311885181/jews-speak-out-favor-banning-circumcision-minors …………………….

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: